Month: February 2013

  • On the Couch: Examining a cinephile

    On the Couch: Examining a cinephile

    CouchIn an attempt to discover where and when I was first overtaken by that most all-encompassing and endlessly satisfying of disorders, cinephilia, I’ve recently been reflecting on my early years. I can only apologise in advance for this incredibly narcissistic post, which might well prove more interesting for me as therapy than it will for you as the reader.

    I know it was already there in a juvenile form during my teen years. I still vividly remember defending The Thin Red Line and 2001: A Space Odyssey on separate occasions in the school yard. I remember being accused of pretending to like them because I was “trying to sound smart” – an accusation that was only half true. I wasn’t pretending to like them, but like any teenage boy attempting to define himself by his newly discovered passions, I was definitely trying to sound smart. The truth was that I couldn’t have articulated what made these films interesting to me at the time, it was more their implicit strength, dignity and mystery that I understood than any kind of textual meaning.

    I know it was already there in my primary school years. In fact, I remember that this was when I first saw 2001: A Space Odyssey. My father told me to watch it, and by the end I was totally lost in its graceful calm, ghostlike machinery and transcendent imagery. What was it about, exactly? My father told me that nobody really knew. I found this answer totally unsatisfying and attempting to answer it was probably my first introduction to truly engaging with the form.

    Aside from this one particular expedition into the unknown, my younger years were primarily about a total obsession with Stallone, Norris, Van Damme, Robocop, and most importantly, Schwarzenegger. The first time that my parents placed their hands over my eyes as Uncle Arnie (a handle applied by my father that led me to believe Arnie and I were related) came across the skinned corpses in Predator, I knew that the moving image would provide me with an endless window into an array of visual stimulations – both fantastic and horrifying – that I would be unlikely to find anywhere else. It seems my parent’s lacklustre attempts at censorship had a counterproductive effect, because up until my early twenties I had something of an obsession with morbidly ensuring that I had seen everything which pushed the furthest boundaries of decency, or perhaps indecency (90% of which seemed to come from Italy – it was Rogero Deodata’s Cannibal Holocaust that horrified me enough that I would abandon this particular channel of filmic interest for all time). This is not an uncommon trait amongst younger cinephiles.

    My conviction that such mature material was superior (well, I thought it was mature at the time), led me to the pretentious belief that cartoons and kid’s books were for the inferior child. This quickly resulted in constant trips to the video store to borrow piles of horror and action films that I should not have seen, as well as in my reading the entire collection of Stephen King books that my parents had amassed over the years. Soon enough, I found myself becoming a schoolyard expert on all things grotesque and inappropriate. I was that odd boy who drew pictures of monsters being eviscerated while the others drew flowers. I was the boy whose short stories always involved traps, explosions, and inevitably the deaths of all the main characters. I was, in fact, the boy you didn’t want your boy to play with.

    But it goes back earlier than that, I think. As a younger child, I was rarely able to sleep peacefully through the night. I had a fear of the dark, most especially in the later hours of the night when I could hear that my parents were asleep and that I was essentially alone in the universe. As a result, I would often be kept up by horrible images I’d seen on television, and occasionally they would result in rather vivid nightmares. Here, I’ll attempt to catalogue a handful of the moments that left an indelible scar on my childhood:

    Untitled film

    There was a film I saw glimpses of as a child, peeping around the corner as my parents watched it on television (I suspect it was Japanese). A woman is having the image of a spider tattooed on her arm – involuntarily, I believe. The tattoo begins to crawl up her shoulder then neck. In my memories, the bite that occurs moments later results in some Exorcist style projectile vomiting – but this may be an addition I have made to my memory over time. Whatever this film was, it haunted me for years to come. If you know, please tell me.

    Twin Peaks

    I had a regular nightmare that started occurring after seeing something bizarre on television as a child – a man appearing from behind a curtain with clearly malign intent. It was not until I was in my twenties that I discovered that this was a scene (not a particularly scary one) from David Lynch’s Twin Peaks, involving the character of Leo.

    Weird Al Yankovic – I’m Fat

    If you can believe it, I once had a horrifying nightmare as a young child that involved the gang from Weird Al Yankovic’s I’m Fat kidnapping me as I walked down a main street in Melbourne, Australia (Chapel Street, for those in the know). My mother kept walking, apparently unable to hear my screams for help. How embarrassing.

    Blue Velvet

    It might seem unlikely that a filmmaker whose work appears to take place in a kind of surreal dream space would happen to have infected my own thoughts as a child on two occasions, but it is true. Like Twin Peaks, it was only years later when I was going through the obligatory David Lynch phase that I discovered the “Love Letter” scene in Blue Velvet was one that I happened to see as a child. It didn’t result in any nightmares that I can recall, but it did prevent me from getting to sleep at night for a long time.

    The Wizard of Oz

    This one is probably fairly standard but it definitely messed me up as a child. The film would roll along so well and I’d be having fun, but every time the witch would show up my heart rate would go through the roof. Definitely kept me up on multiple occasions.

    Very little has been accomplished here beyond me discovering that this piece of writing is significantly more morbid than I intended it to be when I began. I suppose the conclusion I would have to come to is that my passion for cinema began with a strange curiosity about the things that most terrified me as a child, and a desire to conquer those things by not turning away. Or maybe not…

  • Sunshine: A Valentine’s Day letter to a film that deserves more love

    Sunshine: A Valentine’s Day letter to a film that deserves more love

    A brief Valentine’s Day letter to a film that has received far less love than it deserves, Danny Boyle’s Sunshine (2007) – published early to keep the day for my long-suffering better half 😉

    Dearest Sunshine,

    I am writing to you on Valentine’s Day to express my total dedication to your radiant power, and to let you know that I will never succumb to the seemingly endless pressure placed upon me to abandon you and deny your qualities.

    Your parentage, in so far as it can be said that you have parents, is probably most accurately attributable to Danny Boyle (from whom you got your good looks, energetic pace and emotive impact) and Alex Garland (from whom you got your quick wit and social conscience). I do hope that, wherever they are today, they are proud of what you have become – especially given the harsh criticism to which you have been subjected.

    You are, of course, descended from a long and honourable line of science fiction masterworks dedicated to the questioning, illuminating and celebrating of the universe and man’s place within it. From Lang’s Metropolis to Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey, to Tarkovsky’s Solaris, to Scott’s Blade Runner… the torch has been passed down through the generations.  But these ancestors have been accepted into the canon, where as you have not. Why is this?

    Many varied criticisms have been made of you, some of which are at least understandable, while others seem totally disconnected from the film I know and love. Of course the largest, and perhaps the most popular of these stems from the shift within your third act. I shan’t go into detail here; it’s not my place to rob future viewers of the joy of seeing you for the first time. But I will say that many have perceived a shift in the last portion of your tale that seems incongruent and perhaps not in keeping with your first two acts. To this I would simply say that, by taking the almost religious solar awe demonstrated by some characters in your earliest stages, and displaying the logical conclusion of indulging this fixation, you have managed to create a beautiful and multi-layered allusion to humanity’s inability to appreciate their insignificance with respect to the universe; their desire to construct spiritual meanings that allow them to conceal said insignificance; and ultimately their desire to take upon themselves the absolute and awesome power which they have beheld  in nature but which will always lie beyond their grasp. In other words, where some see a facile Hollywood descent into genre cop-out, I see a flawless and complex mirror held up to the human race.

    There are so many moments at which you seem to attain a kind of perfection of expression, embedding within a single insignificant moment massive truths about what it is to be alive in the universe. I shan’t go on about these too much; you are totally familiar with your own composition after all. But there is one moment when a single misstep has the potential to jeopardise not just the future, but also to turn human history into dust. This is never said, never spoken – it is simply true. The moment is so typical of you – you’re so often composed of asides that are easily missed by those simply in search of a plot to follow.

    And that is what you are, Sunshine. Simply a kind of human truth, somehow contained within the confines of a mere genre picture – more than the sum of its parts. No doubt you will eventually make it into the canon and take your place among the greats. And if you don’t, the failing will lie with us rather than you.

    Happy Valentine’s Day, Sunshine.

  • New Trailer: Lords of Salem

    New Trailer: Lords of Salem

    salemHorror is an incredibly difficult genre to do well. And while I’ve seen hundreds of horror films over the years in search of the ultimate terror experience, I would have to say that there have been very few that I would consider great. When I say great, I suppose I refer to those films that are not just scary (which is very rare in itself) but those that are actually deemed qualitatively impressive beyond the confines of their own community of genre fans. Re-Animator is very funny, for example, and will always hold a soft spot in my heart, but it is neither scary nor a particularly well made film.

    It will surprise many (perhaps most) people to hear me say that I believe Rob Zombie is one of the few filmmakers who makes great horror films. I’ll stand behind House of 1000 Corpses, and more importantly his remake of Carpenter’s over-canonised Halloween, any day of the week. I expect most people will disagree, but I see in his work a technical proficiency and deep understanding of what horrifies that I don’t see in many other filmmakers who have worked within the genre. Having said that, he does cross lines that I’m not always particularly comfortable with – but I suppose that’s the horrifying part!

    All this is an elongated way of saying that the trailer for Zombie’s new film, Lords of Salem, is out and I’m excited. Take a look: